![interim national security strategic guidance interim national security strategic guidance](https://spacenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Screen-Shot-2021-03-03-at-5.58.28-PM-879x485.png)
Blinken's speech and the interim guidance called for renewing democracy, managing relations with China, and addressing climate change as top priorities. The second test will be whether global health security remains a priority after the pandemic given the administration's other foreign policy and national security objectives. This "back to the future" approach reflects unavoidable public health and political realities
![interim national security strategic guidance interim national security strategic guidance](https://i0.wp.com/councilonstrategicrisks.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Cabinet_of_President_Joe_Biden_in_2021.jpg)
government failed for more than 20 years to adequately fund and sustainably implement the global health security strategy. The CFR Independent Task Force on Pandemic Preparedness found that the U.S. The first test for the Biden administration's approach will be whether it can implement the global health security strategy at home and abroad more effectively than did previous administrations. foreign policy and national security on global health in a post-pandemic world is important. The global health security strategy has long had bipartisan support, an advantage in a politically polarized Washington, DC. The strategy also reflects domestic political calculations in a divided country about the imperative of centering foreign policy and national security, first and foremost, on protecting the American people.Īlthough the battle with COVID-19 remains to be won, thinking about U.S. Given the death and damage wrought by COVID-19, the Biden administration must prioritize ending the crisis in the United States, building back domestic pandemic preparedness and response capabilities, and using diplomacy and foreign assistance to protect the country from future pathogenic dangers. Secretary of State Antony Blinken delivers remarks about priorities for the Biden administration in the Ben Franklin room at the State Department in Washington, DC on March 3, 2021.Įven so, this "back to the future" approach reflects unavoidable public health and political realities. Neither Blinken nor the interim guidance reflected on how this strategy failed to prepare the United States to respond effectively to the COVID-19 pandemic. It spent over two decades prioritizing global health security, defined as protecting the United States from pandemics and other infectious diseases by strengthening domestic public health, being a leader in global health, and providing assistance to foreign countries to reduce infectious disease risks to the United States. government broadened its conception of national security to incorporate infectious disease threats.
![interim national security strategic guidance interim national security strategic guidance](https://www.lambdalegal.org/sites/default/files/styles/share_fb/public/images/share/facebook/betsy_devos_c_gage_skidmore.jpg)
This global health security strategy requires improving domestic health security, demonstrating diplomatic leadership in global health, and providing foreign assistance to strengthen health systems in other countries to "reduce the risk of future pandemics that can threaten our people and our economy."īut this approach mirrors the strategy and priorities the United States has pursued in global health for more than 20 years. Like other challenges that blur lines between domestic and foreign policy, the pandemic informs the president's call in the guidance for "a new and broader understanding of national security" that protects the American people and economy from infectious diseases. foreign policy and national security concerning global health. Secretary Blinken's speech and President Biden's guidance highlight how COVID-19 affects U.S. Interim National Security Strategic Guidance
![interim national security strategic guidance interim national security strategic guidance](https://www.everycrsreport.com/files/20180201_R45091_images_8a2e89014871d92dcf3cdbde1de127450c8681c4.png)
approach is reimagined.Ī new and broader understanding of national security In fact, the administration's top strategic priorities suggest that, after the COVID-19 crisis in the United States wanes, global health may fade in importance unless the U.S. However, the approach offered is neither new nor bold. Building on the president's first foreign policy speech, Blinken's speech and the guidance emphasize that the world has changed, is at an inflection point, and requires bold, new U.S. On March 3, Secretary of State Antony Blinken gave a speech and President Joe Biden released Interim National Security Strategic Guidance that provided additional insight into the administration's foreign policy and national security thinking on global health.